TOWARDS A PERFECT
JUSTICE AGENCY
they lived for
truth
and suffered
for their trust
in the power
of justice
all was good
at their trade
but they always
be failures?
1.THE NEED OF A MORE POWERFUL JUSTICE AGENCY
Now, in world are many categories of people.
There are people who have a sense or a consciosness of justice and there are people who search for the best ways to gain succes independentlly of the
justice principles.
The justice agent is imperfect in the folowing sense:
it do not know all the illegalities that was made, that are made and that will be made.
it cannot prevent all the illegalities.
it cannot punish all the people who
had made ilegalities; there are many people in the world and in the history of world that, due to their mony or manipulative and deceptive inteligence or relationships, escape of punishment .
sometimes laws are injust.
our justice conception is progressible.
Because of this imperfections many people, about justice agent do not know, or maybe do not want to know, anything, had suffered. It is imposible for me to present their list or the quantity of their pain.
There exist and existed before many people in the world who search the imperfections and weakenesses of laws to make the most profitable injusticies. And, after they made this injusticies they wipe all signs.
When this injusticies are to great, and it seem that it is no posible any application of a punisment, those who suffer them blaim god
It is a great need of an perfect impartial justice agent, but, there is no god
If there is no omniscience and omnipotence, there cannot be omnijustice?
In the history of world there was many inteligent peoples who discovered many new posibities.
On the one hand, there was scientists, artists, politicians, lawers, and others that discovered new good posibilities, on the other hand, there was and there are people who discover new injust profitable posibilities.
It seem that there is no, and there will never be a world in wich the posibility to make injusticies to be minimized.
What make it posible the realization of these injust actions?
How would be posible to minimze the number and gravity of injust actions?
How much would be the gain and the happiness of minimization of injustice?
From antiquity humans aspired at a perfect/divine justice and justice agent.
But, a perfect justice agent involve omniscience, omnipotence and impartiality
However, I think that human justice and justice agency can make new fundamental evolutionary steps.
I think at the ways of minimize the injust actions; justice agent is taken many times tipically by surprise.
There are no scientific institutionalised systematic efforts to calculate all the posible injust actions at all the levels of society
at the level of individ.
at the level public institutions.
at the level of press.
at the political level.
If this posibilities of illegal actions
would be know, the next step would can be their prevention.
There are no scientific institutionalised systematic efforts to calculate the absolute action posibilities and the context-relative actions posibilities at all the previous levels and for all the posible contexts, for our security.
There are no payed scientific institutionalised systematic efforts to find ways to minimize the the posibility of realization of all the injust posibilities.
That is why, at least in part, we suffer in continuation.
It is not the most inteligent thing
to have good experts for discovery of injust actions.
I think that, a great evolutionary step in human justice and justice agency
would be assured by the systematic pursuit of the next pragmatic regulative principle:
The minimization of the posibilities to make injust actions imply the minimization of realization of injust actions.
But, I think that, the application of this principle have as a previous condition of posibility the knowledge of all injust strategical posibilities of agents at all the social organization levels.
Maybe this principle, sometimes, was pursuited, but, in an unconscious or inexplicit and nonscientific, noninstitutionalised manner.
In the time in wich we work hardlly with our inteligence in the limits of our justice conception, others try to develop a deceptive and manipulative and thief inteligence to gain the results of our work and our deserved
place in the social hierarchy.
We loss because of our justice principles of behaviour and because of the imperfections of justice agency.
Sometimes, we have not time or we are incapable to calculate all the injust posibilities wich would can affect us.
On the other hand, why we live in society? To manipulate and deceive each others?
Always will be people wich will love this posibility.
But, if the justice agency is inefficient
how will we rationally justify our just actions?
By non-inteligence?
By the evolution of inteligence appear new deceptive and manipulative posibilities.
I think that wisdom must to imply justice and freedom, therefore it does not involve deceptive and manipulative behaviour, but this thoughts must to be grounded.
A rational belive would say that the deceptive and manipulative behaviour will be detected at least in long time, but this is not necessary or depend also on the evolution of justice agency.
I tell you an partial story to see a
kind of injust posibility:
There was once, a workoholic student.
But, this student was very
independent and critical in his ideas and behaviour at courses and seminars.
This student have had in its class a student competitor that was very sly:
she tried to gain the sympathy of proffesors by flatering them and relative to class have had a nice, but, in secret, very deceptive and manipulative behaviour. For exemple, in the ideatic fights in class she allied temporarlly
with everybody, even with its anemies, for the sake of succes. Its mentality was fundamentaly independent of every justice conception; but it showed herself
as a good person, especially to those weak.
When the individual and independent thinking of the workoholic student have arrived at some veridical ideas, she tried to misinterpret its behaviour:
she tried to attract the discredit and irony of class and of professors on it.
she used subtle tactics of psychological influence; for exemple, when he was was said
something, she tried to stomble it by creating some ironical backgrounds or by irritating it etc.
This competitor student tried to create for herself good relationships with some proffesors, those who had a similar interests with she. Its mentality was, in secret, one fundamentaly sly, injust.
Most times she was not sufficient powerfull to win independently and with the power of truth or of just inteligence.
That is why she used other injust tactics.
After she gained the sympathy of those who feeled somehow threatened theirself, they had begun to fight together legally but injustlly.
The workoholic and independent student, who always tried to win with truth in the limits of justice, feeled more hate relative to its competitor fundamental etichal mentality.
Therefore, it selected a licence theme in the same domain with its competitor to be in competition with she.
Both was under the co-ordination of the same professor, so she begun to
friendlly 'understand' with the
professor.
The independent one begun to work hardly informing itself by international journals(in some limits, because was poor), but hated the idea to be c-oo-rdinated by somebody, much more he tried to compete with this professor at seminars.
The formal conditions wich should be fulfilled by licence works and their evaluation criterions was not popularized.
On the other hand, the workoholic student sometimes changed the bibliography for some papers in favour of some other better bibliography.
In final, all presented their licence work.
The workoholic student's licence work does not filled some formal conditions, about he does not knew anything, and was rejected.
Its pain was inexpressible and its competitor received a maxim evaluation.
The workoholic one was at least by the first active minds in its class.
Its work was substantiated by the wish of a rational and hierarchical progress,in the shorter possible time.
He lost friends for study time, lived far from home and was sponsorized most times only by a poor and sickly mother. And this was the result.
He loved philosophy of science, logic and tended toward a absolut thinking.
She had and have fundamentally an dialectic-pragmatic-deceptive-manipulative mentality, and this peoples are dominant now days.
Now, she is at master in philosophy of science and he is not.
Someday, he made a visit at his previous colleagues from faculty wich
are now at master and she hardlly retained to burst into laughter with
all its heartwhen saw him.
Those who know the mentality exhibited by all the students in four years in faculty, also know who would be deserved to progress in this sense and who does not deserved. In truth, here was made an legall injustice.
The absolute or individual power lover have another chance in the february of 2004, with the same professor.
After of a summer of study he presented to profesor a new bibliography, the professor ignored all its work and gived to he another bibliography, I think not a better one.
The professor selected the co-authors names for bibliography so as if the student accept this to be for him un unbearable humility and if does not accept to reject him again.
When the professor rejected him first time he said 'you can to come to me one hundred of times!'
The professor do not like to hear the student's arguments and suggested to student, with other words, that if he do not like something to change the professor.
This profesor have an eliminativist
lover thinking(he like Churchlands) and said to student that there is no manipulation and subtle psychological coercition.
The student asked to professor to give him the licence work of its competitor for critics, given the fact that they was in the field of philosophy where 'who reject the examination of reason does not deserve respect', but the professor does not want to give to him
In truth, this professor protect its competitor licence work against critics, injustly, but with fine words
Sometimes, this student is very desperate, he think that all was useless and cannot accept this he fear that he never will have the chance to revenge in the limits of law on its injust competitors, because they try to distroy its progress
When he loss every hope, alternate between desperation and criminal fury
I feel regret for this man, but I cannot help him.
There is now law for this kind of injusticies in his country
In addition, he haven't mony to sponsorise lawers.
He have no evidences.
The professors are all united.
Much more, this injustice was made by professor on legall grounds.
He arrived in this situation because always hated to develop its manipulation and deception abilities.
He hated some aspects of social life.
There are many people now on the planet who have fundamentally an injust mentality.
There are many situations for wich justice agency is not prepared to solve them.
And, this is because it does not know neither of their posibilty nor how to prevent them.
There is a need of serious scientific calculation of all or at least the most grave injust possibilities.
If in faculties from the world are made such injusticies, then what injusticies are made now at political level?
Who would be able to calculate all the possible political injusticies?
At least in principle, it is not imposible and progress is a question of time and thinking-work.
It is very hard to know all that it happen on the planet at the most lower/individual levels of society.
That is why we need to know all the posible injust actions and how to prevent them, it is more economically and rationally.
